linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH 4/5] nvmet-rdma: add a NVMe over Fabrics RDMA target driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <057a01d1c2a3$3082eec0$9188cc40$@opengridcomputing.com>
Date:	Thu, 9 Jun 2016 18:03:51 -0500
From:	"Steve Wise" <swise@...ngridcomputing.com>
To:	"'Sagi Grimberg'" <sagi@...htbits.io>,
	"'Christoph Hellwig'" <hch@....de>, <axboe@...nel.dk>,
	<keith.busch@...el.com>
Cc:	<linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org>, <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"'Armen Baloyan'" <armenx.baloyan@...el.com>,
	"'Jay Freyensee'" <james.p.freyensee@...el.com>,
	"'Ming Lin'" <ming.l@....samsung.com>, <linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 4/5] nvmet-rdma: add a NVMe over Fabrics RDMA target driver

<snip>

> > +
> > +static int nvmet_rdma_cm_handler(struct rdma_cm_id *cm_id,
> > +		struct rdma_cm_event *event)
> > +{
> > +	struct nvmet_rdma_queue *queue = NULL;
> > +	int ret = 0;
> > +
> > +	if (cm_id->qp)
> > +		queue = cm_id->qp->qp_context;
> > +
> > +	pr_debug("%s (%d): status %d id %p\n",
> > +		rdma_event_msg(event->event), event->event,
> > +		event->status, cm_id);
> > +
> > +	switch (event->event) {
> > +	case RDMA_CM_EVENT_CONNECT_REQUEST:
> > +		ret = nvmet_rdma_queue_connect(cm_id, event);

The above nvmet cm event handler, nvmet_rdma_cm_handler(), calls
nvmet_rdma_queue_connect() for CONNECT_REQUEST events, which calls
nvmet_rdma_alloc_queue (), which, if it encounters a failure (like creating
the qp), calls nvmet_rdma_cm_reject () which calls rdma_reject().  The
non-zero error, however, gets returned back here and this function returns
the error to the RDMA_CM which will also reject the connection as well as
destroy the cm_id.  So there are two rejects happening, I think.  Either
nvmet should reject and destroy the cm_id, or it should do neither and
return non-zero to the RDMA_CM to reject/destroy.

Steve.