[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160609064455.GB24777@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2016 08:44:56 +0200
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] proc_oom_score: remove tasklist_lock and pid_alive()
On Wed 08-06-16 23:19:21, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> This was needed before to ensure that ->signal != 0 and do_each_thread()
> is safe, see the commit b95c35e76b29b for details.
>
> Today tsk->signal can't go away and for_each_thread(tsk) is always safe.
>
> Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
> ---
> fs/proc/base.c | 7 ++-----
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/proc/base.c b/fs/proc/base.c
> index a11eb71..93e7754 100644
> --- a/fs/proc/base.c
> +++ b/fs/proc/base.c
> @@ -579,11 +579,8 @@ static int proc_oom_score(struct seq_file *m, struct pid_namespace *ns,
> unsigned long totalpages = totalram_pages + total_swap_pages;
> unsigned long points = 0;
>
> - read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
> - if (pid_alive(task))
> - points = oom_badness(task, NULL, NULL, totalpages) *
> - 1000 / totalpages;
> - read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
> + points = oom_badness(task, NULL, NULL, totalpages) *
> + 1000 / totalpages;
> seq_printf(m, "%lu\n", points);
>
> return 0;
> --
> 2.5.0
>
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists