[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160609121802.GD24777@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2016 14:18:02 +0200
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
To: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>, kernel-team@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/10] mm: base LRU balancing on an explicit cost model
On Wed 08-06-16 12:16:05, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 02:51:37PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > On Mon 06-06-16 15:48:33, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> > > Rename struct zone_reclaim_stat to struct lru_cost, and move from two
> > > separate value ratios for the LRU lists to a relative LRU cost metric
> > > with a shared denominator.
> >
> > I just do not like the too generic `number'. I guess cost or price would
> > fit better and look better in the code as well. Up you though...
>
> Yeah, I picked it as a pair, numerator and denominator. But as Minchan
> points out, denom is superfluous in the final version of the patch, so
> I'm going to remove it and give the numerators better names.
>
> anon_cost and file_cost?
Yes that is much more descriptive and easier to grep for. I didn't
propose that because I thought you would want to preserve the array
definition for an easier code to update them.
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists