linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V2] MAINTAINERS: Add Dialog PMIC search terms for missing documentation and header files

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160609135721.GC2385@dell>
Date:	Thu, 9 Jun 2016 14:57:21 +0100
From:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:	"Opensource [Steve Twiss]" <stwiss.opensource@...semi.com>,
	LINUXKERNEL <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Support Opensource <Support.Opensource@...semi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] MAINTAINERS: Add Dialog PMIC search terms for missing
 documentation and header files

On Wed, 08 Jun 2016, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 05:25:30PM +0000, Opensource [Steve Twiss] wrote:
> > On 08 June 2016 15:19, Mark Brown wrote:
> 
> > > We *really* shouldn't be blocking on my ack for trivial changes outside
> > > the subsystem like this though :(
> 
> > There had been no reply since my first e-mail round about a month ago, so I
> > figured there was something wrong with the patch submission.
> 
> It was the activity pattern on the patch more than anything else, and of
> course the merge window was in that month as well.
> 
> > In future I will split up the responsibility and define the Subject line better to
> > remove any ambiguity.
> 
> Like I say a trivial maintainers update like this really should just get
> applied anyway.

Right.  I was about to apply this regardless.

The issue was not specific to this patch. I tend to go dark during
the merge-window to concentrate on my 'real job' (TM).  I applied your
other patch because it's the one I came across first.  This one was
marked as "to review" (as I am doing now).

Don't worry about splitting, I will apply this and remove the other.

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog