lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1465483027-27679-1-git-send-email-kamal@canonical.com>
Date:	Thu,  9 Jun 2016 07:37:07 -0700
From:	Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
To:	Paul Burton <paul.burton@...tec.com>
Cc:	James Hogan <james.hogan@...tec.com>, linux-mips@...ux-mips.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
	Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>,
	kernel-team@...ts.ubuntu.com
Subject: [4.2.y-ckt stable] Patch "MIPS: Fix BC1{EQ,NE}Z return offset calculation" has been added to the 4.2.y-ckt tree

This is a note to let you know that I have just added a patch titled

    MIPS: Fix BC1{EQ,NE}Z return offset calculation

to the linux-4.2.y-queue branch of the 4.2.y-ckt extended stable tree 
which can be found at:

    https://git.launchpad.net/~canonical-kernel/linux/+git/linux-stable-ckt/log/?h=linux-4.2.y-queue

This patch is scheduled to be released in version 4.2.8-ckt12.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to this tree, please 
reply to this email.

For more information about the 4.2.y-ckt tree, see
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/Dev/ExtendedStable

Thanks.
-Kamal

---8<------------------------------------------------------------

>From 18dde650963a77d3fd79b8cbf23c865fb91c2ded Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Burton <paul.burton@...tec.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 14:04:46 +0100
Subject: MIPS: Fix BC1{EQ,NE}Z return offset calculation

commit ac1496980f1d2752f26769f5db63afbc9ac2b603 upstream.

The conditions for branching when emulating the BC1EQZ & BC1NEZ
instructions were backwards, leading to each of those instructions being
treated as the other. Fix this by reversing the conditions, and clear up
the code a little for readability & checkpatch.

Fixes: c8a34581ec09 ("MIPS: Emulate the BC1{EQ,NE}Z FPU instructions")
Signed-off-by: Paul Burton <paul.burton@...tec.com>
Reviewed-by: James Hogan <james.hogan@...tec.com>
Cc: linux-mips@...ux-mips.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/13151/
Signed-off-by: Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>
Signed-off-by: Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
---
 arch/mips/kernel/branch.c | 18 +++---------------
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/mips/kernel/branch.c b/arch/mips/kernel/branch.c
index d8f9b35..ceca6cc 100644
--- a/arch/mips/kernel/branch.c
+++ b/arch/mips/kernel/branch.c
@@ -688,21 +688,9 @@ int __compute_return_epc_for_insn(struct pt_regs *regs,
 			}
 			lose_fpu(1);    /* Save FPU state for the emulator. */
 			reg = insn.i_format.rt;
-			bit = 0;
-			switch (insn.i_format.rs) {
-			case bc1eqz_op:
-				/* Test bit 0 */
-				if (get_fpr32(&current->thread.fpu.fpr[reg], 0)
-				    & 0x1)
-					bit = 1;
-				break;
-			case bc1nez_op:
-				/* Test bit 0 */
-				if (!(get_fpr32(&current->thread.fpu.fpr[reg], 0)
-				      & 0x1))
-					bit = 1;
-				break;
-			}
+			bit = get_fpr32(&current->thread.fpu.fpr[reg], 0) & 0x1;
+			if (insn.i_format.rs == bc1eqz_op)
+				bit = !bit;
 			own_fpu(1);
 			if (bit)
 				epc = epc + 4 +
--
2.7.4

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ