lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160609202036.GA19638@wunner.de>
Date:	Thu, 9 Jun 2016 22:20:36 +0200
From:	Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de>
To:	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, cmilsted@...hat.com,
	Rafa?? Mi??ecki <zajec5@...il.com>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Matt Fleming <matt@...eblueprint.co.uk>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>, m@...s.ch,
	"linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org" 
	<linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [tip:x86/urgent] x86/quirks: Add early quirk to reset Apple
 AirPort card

On Thu, Jun 09, 2016 at 09:37:53AM -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 4:04 AM, Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de> wrote:
> > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/early-quirks.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/early-quirks.c
> > @@ -747,7 +747,8 @@ static int __init check_dev_quirk(int num, int slot, int func)
> >
> >         if ((type & 0x7f) == PCI_HEADER_TYPE_BRIDGE) {
> >                 sec = read_pci_config_byte(num, slot, func, PCI_SECONDARY_BUS);
> > -               early_pci_scan_bus(sec);
> > +               if (sec > num)
> > +                       early_pci_scan_bus(sec);
> >         }
> >
> >         if (!(type & 0x80))
> 
> If two bridges have sec, then early_pci_scan_bus still could be called
> two times.
> 
> Maybe we can add one static array to recorded scanned bus.
> static unsigned char scanned_bus[256];
> and in early_pci_scan_bus check and set that before scanning.

Well, the PCI core would also scan such a bus twice AFAICS.
And the performance penalty of scanning it twice seems negligible.
Early quirks can prevent double execution by setting QFLAG_APPLY_ONCE.
(Three quirks have set that flag already.)

So I think this shouldn't be a concern.

Thanks,

Lukas

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ