[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1465507015-23052-182-git-send-email-kamal@canonical.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2016 14:16:30 -0700
From: Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-team@...ts.ubuntu.com
Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.2.y-ckt 181/206] s390/vmem: fix identity mapping
4.2.8-ckt12 -stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
---8<------------------------------------------------------------
From: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
commit c34a69059d7876e0793eb410deedfb08ccb22b02 upstream.
The identity mapping is suboptimal for the last 2GB frame. The mapping
will be established with a mix of 4KB and 1MB mappings instead of a
single 2GB mapping.
This happens because of a off-by-one bug introduced with
commit 50be63450728 ("s390/mm: Convert bootmem to memblock").
Currently the identity mapping looks like this:
0x0000000080000000-0x0000000180000000 4G PUD RW
0x0000000180000000-0x00000001fff00000 2047M PMD RW
0x00000001fff00000-0x0000000200000000 1M PTE RW
With the bug fixed it looks like this:
0x0000000080000000-0x0000000200000000 6G PUD RW
Fixes: 50be63450728 ("s390/mm: Convert bootmem to memblock")
Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
---
arch/s390/mm/vmem.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/s390/mm/vmem.c b/arch/s390/mm/vmem.c
index ef7d6c8..f354fd8 100644
--- a/arch/s390/mm/vmem.c
+++ b/arch/s390/mm/vmem.c
@@ -372,7 +372,7 @@ void __init vmem_map_init(void)
ro_end = (unsigned long)&_eshared & PAGE_MASK;
for_each_memblock(memory, reg) {
start = reg->base;
- end = reg->base + reg->size - 1;
+ end = reg->base + reg->size;
if (start >= ro_end || end <= ro_start)
vmem_add_mem(start, end - start, 0);
else if (start >= ro_start && end <= ro_end)
--
2.7.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists