[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1465507015-23052-108-git-send-email-kamal@canonical.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2016 14:15:16 -0700
From: Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-team@...ts.ubuntu.com
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.2.y-ckt 107/206] ring-buffer: Prevent overflow of size in ring_buffer_resize()
4.2.8-ckt12 -stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
---8<------------------------------------------------------------
From: "Steven Rostedt (Red Hat)" <rostedt@...dmis.org>
commit 59643d1535eb220668692a5359de22545af579f6 upstream.
If the size passed to ring_buffer_resize() is greater than MAX_LONG - BUF_PAGE_SIZE
then the DIV_ROUND_UP() will return zero.
Here's the details:
# echo 18014398509481980 > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/buffer_size_kb
tracing_entries_write() processes this and converts kb to bytes.
18014398509481980 << 10 = 18446744073709547520
and this is passed to ring_buffer_resize() as unsigned long size.
size = DIV_ROUND_UP(size, BUF_PAGE_SIZE);
Where DIV_ROUND_UP(a, b) is (a + b - 1)/b
BUF_PAGE_SIZE is 4080 and here
18446744073709547520 + 4080 - 1 = 18446744073709551599
where 18446744073709551599 is still smaller than 2^64
2^64 - 18446744073709551599 = 17
But now 18446744073709551599 / 4080 = 4521260802379792
and size = size * 4080 = 18446744073709551360
This is checked to make sure its still greater than 2 * 4080,
which it is.
Then we convert to the number of buffer pages needed.
nr_page = DIV_ROUND_UP(size, BUF_PAGE_SIZE)
but this time size is 18446744073709551360 and
2^64 - (18446744073709551360 + 4080 - 1) = -3823
Thus it overflows and the resulting number is less than 4080, which makes
3823 / 4080 = 0
an nr_pages is set to this. As we already checked against the minimum that
nr_pages may be, this causes the logic to fail as well, and we crash the
kernel.
There's no reason to have the two DIV_ROUND_UP() (that's just result of
historical code changes), clean up the code and fix this bug.
Fixes: 83f40318dab00 ("ring-buffer: Make removal of ring buffer pages atomic")
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Signed-off-by: Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
---
kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c | 9 ++++-----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
index c3f1f34..f683029 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/ring_buffer.c
@@ -1655,14 +1655,13 @@ int ring_buffer_resize(struct ring_buffer *buffer, unsigned long size,
!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu_id, buffer->cpumask))
return size;
- size = DIV_ROUND_UP(size, BUF_PAGE_SIZE);
- size *= BUF_PAGE_SIZE;
+ nr_pages = DIV_ROUND_UP(size, BUF_PAGE_SIZE);
/* we need a minimum of two pages */
- if (size < BUF_PAGE_SIZE * 2)
- size = BUF_PAGE_SIZE * 2;
+ if (nr_pages < 2)
+ nr_pages = 2;
- nr_pages = DIV_ROUND_UP(size, BUF_PAGE_SIZE);
+ size = nr_pages * BUF_PAGE_SIZE;
/*
* Don't succeed if resizing is disabled, as a reader might be
--
2.7.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists