[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160610063419.GB32285@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 08:34:19 +0200
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
To: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [mmots-2016-06-09-16-49] kernel BUG at mm/slub.c:1616
On Fri 10-06-16 15:11:39, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> Hello,
>
> [ 429.191962] gfp: 2
> [ 429.192634] ------------[ cut here ]------------
> [ 429.193281] kernel BUG at mm/slub.c:1616!
[...]
> [ 429.217369] [<ffffffff811ca221>] bio_alloc_bioset+0xbd/0x1b1
> [ 429.218013] [<ffffffff81148078>] mpage_alloc+0x28/0x7b
> [ 429.218650] [<ffffffff8114856a>] do_mpage_readpage+0x43d/0x545
> [ 429.219282] [<ffffffff81148767>] mpage_readpages+0xf5/0x152
OK, so this is flags & GFP_SLAB_BUG_MASK BUG_ON because gfp is
___GFP_HIGHMEM. It is my [1] patch which has introduced it.
I think we need the following. Andrew could you fold it into
mm-memcg-use-consistent-gfp-flags-during-readahead.patch or maybe keep
it as a separate patch?
[1] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1465301556-26431-1-git-send-email-mhocko@kernel.org
Thanks for the report Sergey!
---
>From 89cfc9bf27b9b5af47fece7eab36deb2fb04516d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 08:27:33 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] mm: restrict gfp mask in mpage_alloc
Sergey has reported that we might hit BUG_ON in new_slab() because
unrestricted gfp mask used for the readahead purposes contains
incompatible flags (__GFP_HIGHMEM in his case):
[ 429.191962] gfp: 2
[ 429.192634] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[ 429.193281] kernel BUG at mm/slub.c:1616!
[...]
[ 429.217369] [<ffffffff811ca221>] bio_alloc_bioset+0xbd/0x1b1
[ 429.218013] [<ffffffff81148078>] mpage_alloc+0x28/0x7b
[ 429.218650] [<ffffffff8114856a>] do_mpage_readpage+0x43d/0x545
[ 429.219282] [<ffffffff81148767>] mpage_readpages+0xf5/0x152
Make sure that mpage_alloc always restricts the mask GFP_KERNEL subset.
This is what was done before "mm, memcg: use consistent gfp flags during
readahead" explicitly by mapping_gfp_constraint(mapping, GFP_KERNEL) in
mpage_readpages.
Reported-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>
---
fs/mpage.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/mpage.c b/fs/mpage.c
index 9c11255b0797..5ce75b2e60d1 100644
--- a/fs/mpage.c
+++ b/fs/mpage.c
@@ -71,7 +71,7 @@ mpage_alloc(struct block_device *bdev,
{
struct bio *bio;
- bio = bio_alloc(gfp_flags, nr_vecs);
+ bio = bio_alloc(gfp_flags & GFP_KERNEL, nr_vecs);
if (bio == NULL && (current->flags & PF_MEMALLOC)) {
while (!bio && (nr_vecs /= 2))
--
2.8.1
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists