[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1465542996-12534-4-git-send-email-andrew@aj.id.au>
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 16:46:35 +0930
From: Andrew Jeffery <andrew@...id.au>
To: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, trivial@...nel.org,
Andrew Jeffery <andrew@...id.au>
Subject: [PATCH 3/4] pinctrl.txt: s/have/has/ in GPIO driver interaction description
Signed-off-by: Andrew Jeffery <andrew@...id.au>
---
Documentation/pinctrl.txt | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/pinctrl.txt b/Documentation/pinctrl.txt
index cefcf5d88a1c..07d102c3d05a 100644
--- a/Documentation/pinctrl.txt
+++ b/Documentation/pinctrl.txt
@@ -286,7 +286,7 @@ see the section named "pin control requests from drivers" and
"drivers needing both pin control and GPIOs" below for details. But in some
situations a cross-subsystem mapping between pins and GPIOs is needed.
-Since the pin controller subsystem have its pinspace local to the pin
+Since the pin controller subsystem has its pinspace local to the pin
controller we need a mapping so that the pin control subsystem can figure out
which pin controller handles control of a certain GPIO pin. Since a single
pin controller may be muxing several GPIO ranges (typically SoCs that have
--
2.7.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists