lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 9 Jun 2016 17:45:42 -0700
From:	Deepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@...il.com>
To:	Steve Grubb <sgrubb@...hat.com>
Cc:	linux-audit@...hat.com,
	Linux FS-devel Mailing List <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, y2038@...ts.linaro.org,
	Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 17/21] audit: Use timespec64 to represent audit timestamps

On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 7:31 AM, Steve Grubb <sgrubb@...hat.com> wrote:
> On Wednesday, June 08, 2016 10:05:01 PM Deepa Dinamani wrote:
>> Audit timestamps are recorded in string format into
>> an audit buffer for a given context.
>> These mark the entry timestamps for the syscalls.
>> Use y2038 safe struct timespec64 to represent the times.
>> The log strings can handle this transition as strings can
>> hold upto 1024 characters.
>
> Have you tested this with ausearch or any audit utilities? As an aside, a time
> stamp that is up to 1024 characters long is terribly wasteful considering how
> many events we get.

/* AUDIT_BUFSIZ is the size of the temporary buffer used for formatting
 * audit records.  Since printk uses a 1024 byte buffer, this buffer
 * should be at least that large. */
#define AUDIT_BUFSIZ 1024

The commit text is pointing out that the reserve space ensured in each
call to audit_log_vformat is already much more than is needed by this
call from audit_log_start.

Also, since struct timespec64 is already the same as struct timespec
on 64-bit systems, there is really no functional change except on
32-bit machines.

Let me know if you want me to try it out on a 32-bit system.

-Deepa

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ