linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 07/15] ARM: exynos: fixup debug macros for big-endian

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 10 Jun 2016 13:16:35 +0200
From:	Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>
To:	Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@...ethink.co.uk>,
	Matthew Leach <matthew@...tleach.net>
Cc:	linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 07/15] ARM: exynos: fixup debug macros for big-endian

On 06/10/2016 01:12 PM, Ben Dooks wrote:
> On 08/06/16 19:31, Matthew Leach wrote:
>> From: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@...ethink.co.uk>
>>
>> The exynos low-level debug macros need to be fixed if the system is being
>> built big endian. Add the necessary endian swaps for accessing the registers
>> to get output working again
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks <ben.dooks@...ethink.co.uk>
>> ---
>>  arch/arm/include/debug/samsung.S | 8 ++++++++
>>  1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
> 
> Should this go via the maintainer or to RMK?
> 
> If to RMK, then shall I get it submitted (and does anyone else
> want to ack?)

If there are no objections, I can take it through samsung-soc with other
arch/arm/mach-exynos* patches.

What I am missing here, is Matthew's Signed-off-by.

Matthew, you touched and sent the patch so could you add the Sob?

Best regards,
Krzysztof