linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/1] Staging: comedi: dmm32at: fix BIT macro issue.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <575AA591.9040307@mev.co.uk>
Date:	Fri, 10 Jun 2016 12:33:37 +0100
From:	Ian Abbott <abbotti@....co.uk>
To:	Ravishankar Karkala Mallikarjunayya <ravishankarkm32@...il.com>,
	hsweeten@...ionengravers.com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org
Cc:	devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] Staging: comedi: dmm32at: fix BIT macro issue.

On 10/06/16 12:15, Ravishankar Karkala Mallikarjunayya wrote:
> This Replace all occurences of (1<<x) by BIT(x) and DMM32AT_CTRL_PAGE(x),
> DMM32AT_AI_CFG_SCINT(x) macros to get rid of checkpatch.pl
> "CHECK" output "Prefer using the BIT macro"
>
> Signed-off-by: Ravishankar Karkala Mallikarjunayya <ravishankarkm32@...il.com>
> ---
>   drivers/staging/comedi/drivers/dmm32at.c | 98 ++++++++++++++++----------------
>   1 file changed, 50 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-)
>

It looks good, but could you repost it as [PATCH v2 1/1] so that Greg 
knows which one to apply?

-- 
-=( Ian Abbott @ MEV Ltd.    E-mail: <abbotti@....co.uk> )=-
-=(                          Web: http://www.mev.co.uk/  )=-