[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160610115845.GA27253@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 13:58:45 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
Cc: Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, cmilsted@...hat.com,
Rafa?? Mi??ecki <zajec5@...il.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Matt Fleming <matt@...eblueprint.co.uk>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>, m@...s.ch,
"linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org"
<linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [tip:x86/urgent] x86/quirks: Add early quirk to reset Apple
AirPort card
* Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org> wrote:
> On 6/9/16, Lukas Wunner <lukas@...ner.de> wrote:
> >
> > Well, the PCI core would also scan such a bus twice AFAICS.
> > And the performance penalty of scanning it twice seems negligible.
> > Early quirks can prevent double execution by setting QFLAG_APPLY_ONCE.
> > (Three quirks have set that flag already.)
> >
> > So I think this shouldn't be a concern.
>
> I don't know. I would like see sth like following, and that is simple enough.
>
> Index: linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/early-quirks.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-2.6.orig/arch/x86/kernel/early-quirks.c
> +++ linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/early-quirks.c
> @@ -755,10 +755,16 @@ static int __init check_dev_quirk(int nu
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static unsigned char __initdata scanned[256];
> static void __init early_pci_scan_bus(int bus)
> {
> int slot, func;
>
> + if (scanned[bus])
> + return;
> +
> + scanned[bus] = 1;
> +
> /* Poor man's PCI discovery */
> for (slot = 0; slot < 32; slot++)
> for (func = 0; func < 8; func++) {
Ok, I removed the fix from tip:x86/urgent from the time being - could you guys
please send a full version once a final approach is agreed upon?
Thanks,
Ingo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists