[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6ab2c663-5559-5818-5357-6801ff452dfb@st.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 14:09:54 +0200
From: Giuseppe CAVALLARO <peppe.cavallaro@...com>
To: Tien Hock Loh <thloh@...era.com>
CC: <robh+dt@...nel.org>, <pawel.moll@....com>, <mark.rutland@....com>,
<ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>, <galak@...eaurora.org>,
<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <thloh85@...il.com>,
Chee Nouk Phoon <cnphoon@...era.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] net: ethernet: Add TSE PCS support to
dwmac-socfpga
Hello Tien Hock
On 6/10/2016 8:12 AM, Tien Hock Loh wrote:
>>> Yeah the PCS support for TSE is Altera. To avoid confusion, let's rename
>>> > > them, would altr_tse_pcs.[hc] be good? I don't think creating a
>>> > > sub-directory with only 2 files is necessary though.
>> >
>> > ok for two files w/o sub-dir.
>> >
>>> > >
>>> > > I see that stmmac.txt is generic, and other vendor's PCS support
>>> > > documents their specific uses in their own *-dwmac.txt (eg.
>>> > > rockchip-dwmac.txt). Is this not the case?
>> >
>> > yes you can use this name convention. I let you decide.
> What I meant was we've documented the bindings in socfpga-dwmac.txt for
> platform specific bindings, and I won't be updating stmmac.txt because
> that is the generic driver binding. Agree?
ok if you documented all in socfpga-dwmac.txt
peppe
Powered by blists - more mailing lists