linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/6] arm64: errata: Calling enable functions for CPU errata too

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <575ADD50.2060109@arm.com>
Date:	Fri, 10 Jun 2016 16:31:28 +0100
From:	Suzuki K Poulose <Suzuki.Poulose@....com>
To:	Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@....com>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
Cc:	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] arm64: errata: Calling enable functions for CPU
 errata too

On 09/05/16 17:49, Andre Przywara wrote:
> Currently we call the (optional) enable function for CPU _features_
> only. As CPU _errata_ descriptions share the same data structure and
> having an enable function is useful for errata as well (for instance
> to set bits in SCTLR), lets call it when enumerating erratas too.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@....com>

These changes look good to me.

Reviewed-by: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>


Suzuki