[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160610163956.GA8696@ulmo.ba.sec>
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 18:39:56 +0200
From: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel@...inux.com, maxime.coquelin@...com, patrice.chotard@...com,
robh+dt@...nel.org, linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 08/20] pwm: Add PWM Capture support
On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 03:38:54PM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Fri, 10 Jun 2016, Thierry Reding wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 10:21:23AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > Supply a PWM Capture call-back Op in order to pass back
> > > information obtained by running analysis on PWM a signal.
> > > This would normally (at least during testing) be called from
> > > the Sysfs routines with a view to printing out PWM Capture
> > > data which has been encoded into a string.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/pwm/core.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > include/linux/pwm.h | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > 2 files changed, 52 insertions(+)
>
> So do you want me to re-spin?
>
> Before you said you'd make adjustments on patches 8 through 10, so I'm
> a little confused.
Yeah, I only realized that it might be quicker to make these adjustments
myself when I had finished looking at patch 10. I've pushed the adjusted
patches to a for-4.8/pwm-capture branch, so if you're going to re-spin
the remainder of the patches, perhaps that could be your base?
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/thierry.reding/linux-pwm.git/log/?h=for-4.8/pwm-capture
If you don't have any objections I can put those into linux-next early
next week.
Thierry
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists