[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160610124525.32cac2e0@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 12:45:25 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Cc: alison@...oton-tech.com, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Clark Williams <williams@...hat.com>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH][RT] netpoll: Always take poll_lock when doing polling
On Fri, 10 Jun 2016 18:20:22 +0200
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de> wrote:
> > We actually triggered a starvation due to this. I was just seeing if
> > Alison hit the same issue we did in our tests.
>
> Okay. Didn't get this information from him. But this is only because
> the softirqs not running in ksoftirqd, right?
Right, I think we supplied this patch before we added the one that
would push repeated softirqs to ksoftirqd. We probably should see if
that patch alone fixes our issue.
-- Steve
Powered by blists - more mailing lists