linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the device-mapper tree with the block tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160610170159.GA29366@redhat.com>
Date:	Fri, 10 Jun 2016 13:01:59 -0400
From:	Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>
To:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:	Alasdair G Kergon <agk@...hat.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the device-mapper tree with the
 block tree

On Thu, Jun 09 2016 at 12:02am -0400,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> On Thu, 9 Jun 2016 13:59:32 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> >
> >   50d14ab0130a ("dm: move request-based code out to dm-rq.[hc]")
> 
> By the way, resolving these conflicts would have been easier if this
> commit had been split into "move with no changes" followed by "small
> changes" commits.

Yeap, I understand.  I've folded your fix into the appropriate commit
and rebased DM's for-next (and dm-4.8) ontop of block's for-4.8/core.

Thanks,
Mike