[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87shwkes65.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 22:54:10 +0300
From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>
To: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com>
Cc: Amitkumar Karwar <akarwar@...vell.com>,
"linux-kernel\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Julian Calaby <julian.calaby@...il.com>,
Shengzhen Li <szli@...vell.com>,
Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@...labora.com>,
"netdev\@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-wireless\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
Nishant Sarmukadam <nishants@...vell.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] mwifiex: move .get_tx_power logic to station ioctl file
Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@....samsung.com> writes:
>> This patch (2/3) is only for code rearrangement and adds an
>> unnecessary wrapper function. We can simply drop the patch.
>
> Agreed.
>
> Kalle,
>
> Patch 3/3 applies cleanly even after dropping patch 2/3.
> Is that Ok for you or do you want me to re-resend a v3
> with only patches 1/3 and 3/3?
I can drop patch 2, no need to resend. Thanks.
--
Kalle Valo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists