[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160610214900.GH11948@wotan.suse.de>
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 23:49:00 +0200
From: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...nel.org>
To: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
Cc: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>,
"Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...nel.org>, cocci@...teme.lip6.fr,
mmarek@...e.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Cocci] [PATCH 4/4] coccicheck: add indexing enhancement options
On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 11:43:57PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > > Well, slightly better.
> >
> > No, it should be much better. You would have to look at the standard
>
> I use id-utils regularly and it is indeed at least a magnitude better.
> The indexing often pays off already with the first coccinelle run for
> me. Highly recommended.
AFAICT coccinelle does not have integration support for id-utils though.
Luis
Powered by blists - more mailing lists