[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d4277886-41b4-e1ea-e015-6e62ac0212de@kernel.org>
Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2016 17:50:20 +0100
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
To: Luis de Bethencourt <luisbg@....samsung.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, lars@...afoo.de,
Michael.Hennerich@...log.com, knaack.h@....de, pmeerw@...erw.net,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] staging: iio: ad5933: fix order of cycle conditions
On 01/06/16 20:25, Luis de Bethencourt wrote:
> Correctly handle the settling time cycles value. The else branch is an
> impossible condition, > 1022 in the else branch of > 511. Flipping the order.
>
> Based on the Table 13 at the bottom of Page 25 of the Data Sheet:
> http://www.analog.com/media/en/technical-documentation/data-sheets/AD5933.pdf
>
> Signed-off-by: Luis de Bethencourt <luisbg@....samsung.com>
> Reviewed-by: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>
While Lars did review, it I'm not seeing an email where he
gave this tag (my inbox may well have eaten it).
Lars, could you confirm that you are happy with the
patch as it now stands.
Certainly looks right to me!
Thanks,
Jonathan
> ---
> drivers/staging/iio/impedance-analyzer/ad5933.c | 6 +++---
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/iio/impedance-analyzer/ad5933.c b/drivers/staging/iio/impedance-analyzer/ad5933.c
> index 9f43976..170ac98 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/iio/impedance-analyzer/ad5933.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/iio/impedance-analyzer/ad5933.c
> @@ -444,10 +444,10 @@ static ssize_t ad5933_store(struct device *dev,
> st->settling_cycles = val;
>
> /* 2x, 4x handling, see datasheet */
> - if (val > 511)
> - val = (val >> 1) | (1 << 9);
> - else if (val > 1022)
> + if (val > 1022)
> val = (val >> 2) | (3 << 9);
> + else if (val > 511)
> + val = (val >> 1) | (1 << 9);
>
> dat = cpu_to_be16(val);
> ret = ad5933_i2c_write(st->client,
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists