[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <yq1shwkfq9z.fsf@sermon.lab.mkp.net>
Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 21:49:44 -0400
From: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
To: Shaohua Li <shli@...com>
Cc: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
<linux-block@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<axboe@...com>, <sitsofe@...oo.com>, <snitzer@...hat.com>,
<hch@...radead.org>, <Kernel-team@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] block: correctly fallback for zeroout
>>>>> "Shaohua" == Shaohua Li <shli@...com> writes:
Shaohua,
>> What does the extra io_err buy us? Just have this function return an
>> error. And then in blkdev_issue_discard if you get -EOPNOTSUPP you
>> special case it there.
Shaohua> The __blkdev_issue_discard returns -EOPNOTSUPP if disk doesn't
Shaohua> support discard. in that case, blkdev_issue_discard doesn't
Shaohua> return 0. blkdev_issue_discard only returns 0 if IO error is
Shaohua> -EOPNOTSUPP.
Oh, I see. The sanity checks are now in __blkdev_issue_discard() so
there is no way to distinguish between -EOPNOTSUPP and the other
-EOPNOTSUPP. *sigh*
I am OK with your patch as a stable fix but this really needs to be
fixed up properly.
--
Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering
Powered by blists - more mailing lists