linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] Please pull powerpc/linux.git powerpc-4.7-3 tag

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 11 Jun 2016 10:19:47 +1000
From:	Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
To:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	"Aneesh Kumar K. V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	gwshan@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	ppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
	Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...abs.org>, raj.khem@...il.com,
	ruscur@...sell.cc, thuth@...hat.com,
	Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Please pull powerpc/linux.git powerpc-4.7-3 tag

On Fri, 2016-06-10 at 12:26 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 8:48 AM, Linus Torvalds
> <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 4:51 AM, Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au> wrote:
> > > 
> > > powerpc fixes for 4.7 #2
> > 
> > This is actually #3 - and some of the things you describe came in
> > already through #2.
> > 
> > Do you mind double-checking your descriptions?
> 
> I double-checked it. Your diffstat and shortlog were out of date (and
> your #2 in the tag message was wong), but your individual descriptions
> matched the actual new commits.

Sorry, clearly 21:51 on a Friday is not a good time for me to be sending pull
requests :/

The tag was correct, just the diffstat & shortlog were wrong (again).

The #2 in the tag is "correct", but clearly confusing. The powerpc-4.7-1 tag is
"updates", and -2 is "fixes", and so -3 is "fixes #2". But I'll try and come up
with a different numbering that is less off-by-one.

I checked your merge and it looks right. Thanks.

cheers