[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1606110717210.2114@localhost6.localdomain6>
Date: Sat, 11 Jun 2016 07:17:35 +0200 (CEST)
From: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
To: "Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...nel.org>
cc: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>, cocci@...teme.lip6.fr,
mmarek@...e.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Cocci] [PATCH 4/4] coccicheck: add indexing enhancement
options
On Fri, 10 Jun 2016, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 11:43:57PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > > > Well, slightly better.
> > >
> > > No, it should be much better. You would have to look at the standard
> >
> > I use id-utils regularly and it is indeed at least a magnitude better.
> > The indexing often pays off already with the first coccinelle run for
> > me. Highly recommended.
>
> AFAICT coccinelle does not have integration support for id-utils though.
Yes it does, for years.
julia
Powered by blists - more mailing lists