[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160612114353.GE20243@tiger>
Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2016 19:43:53 +0800
From: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>
To: Dong Aisheng <aisheng.dong@....com>
Cc: linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, anson.huang@....com,
mturquette@...libre.com, sboyd@...eaurora.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/11] clk: imx6ul: fix pll clock parents
On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 10:33:36PM +0800, Dong Aisheng wrote:
> pllx_bypass_src mux shouldn't be the parent of pllx clock
> since it's only valid when when pllx BYPASS bit is set.
> Thus it is actually one parent of pllx_bypass only.
>
> Instead, pllx parent should be fixed to osc according to
> reference manual.
> Other plls have the same issue.
>
> e.g. before fix, the pll tree is:
> osc 6 6 24000000 0 0
> pll1_bypass_src 0 0 24000000 0 0
> pll1 0 0 792000000 0 0
> pll1_bypass 0 0 792000000 0 0
> pll1_sys 0 0 792000000 0 0
>
> After the fix, it's:
> osc 6 6 24000000 0 0
> pll1 0 0 792000000 0 0
> pll1_bypass 0 0 792000000 0 0
> pll1_sys 0 0 792000000 0 0
>
> Signed-off-by: Dong Aisheng <aisheng.dong@....com>
I squashed 7 ~ 11 into one patch and applied it, thanks.
Shawn
Powered by blists - more mailing lists