linux-kernel - Re: general preparation for NVMe over Fabrics support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160612133318.GA16543@kernel.dk>
Date:	Sun, 12 Jun 2016 07:33:18 -0600
From:	Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To:	Keith Busch <keith.busch@...el.com>
Cc:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: general preparation for NVMe over Fabrics support

On Thu, Jun 09 2016, Keith Busch wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 11:20:42PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > This patch set adds some needed preparations for the upcoming NVMe over
> > Fabrics support.
> > 
> > Contains:
> > - Allow transfer size limitations for NVMe transports
> > - Add the get_log_page command definition required by the NVMe target
> > - more helpers in core code that can be used by various transports
> > - add some missing constants and identify attributes
> 
> This series looks good.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Keith Busch <keith.busch@...e.com>

Added 1-8, 9/10 throws a lot of rejects and it's pre-coffee here. What
is this against?

I corrected your email, unless you joined a hot new startup called Inte.

> For patch ordering, I had thought there were no issues with these
> I submitted:
> 
>   http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-nvme/2016-May/004704.html

This looks fine for 4.7.

>   http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-nvme/2016-May/004709.html

This one is a bit involved...

-- 
Jens Axboe