[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1606122237540.2180@localhost6.localdomain6>
Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2016 22:39:06 +0200 (CEST)
From: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
To: Deepa Dinamani <deepa.kernel@...il.com>
cc: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Gilles Muller <Gilles.Muller@...6.fr>,
Nicolas Palix <nicolas.palix@...g.fr>,
Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] coccicheck: Allow for overriding spatch flags
On Sun, 12 Jun 2016, Deepa Dinamani wrote:
> >> Documentation/coccinelle.txt suggests using the SPFLAGS
> >> make variable to pass additional options to spatch.
> >>
> >> Reorder the way SPFLAGS is added to FLAGS, to allow
> >> for options in the SPFLAGS to override the default
> >> --very-quiet option.
> >>
> >> Similarly, rearrage the FLAGS for org or report mode.
> >> This allows for overriding of the default --no-show-diff
> >> option through SPFLAGS.
> >
> > The first looks like a good idea, but do you find a use case for the
> > second? The diff that is shown in org or report mode may be sort of
> > random. It is just an easy hack to reuse the same pattern code for
> > context, org, and report modes, but there isn't an intent to see the diff
> > produced by context mode in org or report mode.
>
> I thought this at first, that org report mode wouldn't need it the diff.
> But if a user wishes to override the option, then why should we not
> accept that the user knows what they are doing?
I guess... Another issue is that the org/report mode output comes from
python, and the diff output comes from ocaml. They are not synchronized.
Ie, the report won't come out next to the relevant diff.
julia
Powered by blists - more mailing lists