[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <lsq.1465767281.500864233@decadent.org.uk>
Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2016 22:34:41 +0100
From: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
CC: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, "Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@...radead.org>, h.zuidam@...puter.org,
mingo@...hat.com, "Andi Kleen" <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>,
"Jaccon Bastiaansen" <jaccon.bastiaansen@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3.2 07/46] x86: Add 1/2/4/8 byte optimization to 64bit
__copy_{from,to}_user_inatomic
3.2.81-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
commit ff47ab4ff3cddfa7bc1b25b990e24abe2ae474ff upstream.
The 64bit __copy_{from,to}_user_inatomic always called
copy_from_user_generic, but skipped the special optimizations for 1/2/4/8
byte accesses.
This especially hurts the futex call, which accesses the 4 byte futex
user value with a complicated fast string operation in a function call,
instead of a single movl.
Use __copy_{from,to}_user for _inatomic instead to get the same
optimizations. The only problem was the might_fault() in those functions.
So move that to new wrapper and call __copy_{f,t}_user_nocheck()
from *_inatomic directly.
32bit already did this correctly by duplicating the code.
Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1376687844-19857-2-git-send-email-andi@firstfloor.org
Signed-off-by: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...ux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
Cc: Jaccon Bastiaansen <jaccon.bastiaansen@...il.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: mingo@...hat.com
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: h.zuidam@...puter.org
---
arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess_64.h | 24 ++++++++++++++++++------
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess_64.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/uaccess_64.h
@@ -68,11 +68,10 @@ int copy_to_user(void __user *dst, const
}
static __always_inline __must_check
-int __copy_from_user(void *dst, const void __user *src, unsigned size)
+int __copy_from_user_nocheck(void *dst, const void __user *src, unsigned size)
{
int ret = 0;
- might_fault();
if (!__builtin_constant_p(size))
return copy_user_generic(dst, (__force void *)src, size);
switch (size) {
@@ -112,11 +111,17 @@ int __copy_from_user(void *dst, const vo
}
static __always_inline __must_check
-int __copy_to_user(void __user *dst, const void *src, unsigned size)
+int __copy_from_user(void *dst, const void __user *src, unsigned size)
+{
+ might_fault();
+ return __copy_from_user_nocheck(dst, src, size);
+}
+
+static __always_inline __must_check
+int __copy_to_user_nocheck(void __user *dst, const void *src, unsigned size)
{
int ret = 0;
- might_fault();
if (!__builtin_constant_p(size))
return copy_user_generic((__force void *)dst, src, size);
switch (size) {
@@ -156,6 +161,13 @@ int __copy_to_user(void __user *dst, con
}
static __always_inline __must_check
+int __copy_to_user(void __user *dst, const void *src, unsigned size)
+{
+ might_fault();
+ return __copy_to_user_nocheck(dst, src, size);
+}
+
+static __always_inline __must_check
int __copy_in_user(void __user *dst, const void __user *src, unsigned size)
{
int ret = 0;
@@ -221,13 +233,13 @@ __must_check unsigned long __clear_user(
static __must_check __always_inline int
__copy_from_user_inatomic(void *dst, const void __user *src, unsigned size)
{
- return copy_user_generic(dst, (__force const void *)src, size);
+ return __copy_from_user_nocheck(dst, (__force const void *)src, size);
}
static __must_check __always_inline int
__copy_to_user_inatomic(void __user *dst, const void *src, unsigned size)
{
- return copy_user_generic((__force void *)dst, src, size);
+ return __copy_to_user_nocheck((__force void *)dst, src, size);
}
extern long __copy_user_nocache(void *dst, const void __user *src,
Powered by blists - more mailing lists