lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sun, 12 Jun 2016 10:12:20 +0800
From:	Yakir Yang <ykk@...k-chips.com>
To:	Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Cc:	David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
	"dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/6] drm/panel: simple: Add support for Sharp
 LQ123P1JX31 2400x1600 panel

Doug,

On 06/11/2016 12:11 AM, Doug Anderson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 9:35 AM, Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org> wrote:
>> Yakir,
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 4:52 AM, Yakir Yang <ykk@...k-chips.com> wrote:
>>> The Sharp LQ123P1JX31 is an 12.3", 2400x1600 TFT-LCD panel connected
>>> using eDP interfaces.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Yakir Yang <ykk@...k-chips.com>
>>> ---
>>> Changes in v2:
>>> - Add detail timing of Sharp LQ123P1JX31 panel in v2
>>>
>>>   drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-simple.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>>   1 file changed, 26 insertions(+)
>> Looks good to me.  Values in the table match the EDID I see from this
>> panel and everything else looks to be in order.
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
>> Tested-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
> Sorry for not noticing.  :(  ...but as others have pointed out for
> your earlier patches, the size is incorrect.  I found the correct size
> and it should be:
>
>                 .width = 259,
>                 .height = 173,
>

Ah, thanks, would correct it now :-D

- Yakir

> -Doug
>
>
>


Powered by blists - more mailing lists