linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] powercap/rapl: add support for skx

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 13 Jun 2016 23:56:18 +0200
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To:	Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Rafael Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
	Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
	Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@...ux.intel.com>,
	Prarit Bhargava <prarit@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] powercap/rapl: add support for skx

On Monday, June 13, 2016 11:32:10 PM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Monday, May 23, 2016 09:45:42 AM Jacob Pan wrote:
> > SKX RAPL interface is similar to HSX/BDX.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/powercap/intel_rapl.c | 1 +
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/powercap/intel_rapl.c b/drivers/powercap/intel_rapl.c
> > index 470bb62..a417e68 100644
> > --- a/drivers/powercap/intel_rapl.c
> > +++ b/drivers/powercap/intel_rapl.c
> > @@ -1096,6 +1096,7 @@ static const struct x86_cpu_id rapl_ids[] __initconst = {
> >  	RAPL_CPU(0x4E, rapl_defaults_core),/* Skylake */
> >  	RAPL_CPU(0x4C, rapl_defaults_cht),/* Braswell/Cherryview */
> >  	RAPL_CPU(0x4A, rapl_defaults_tng),/* Tangier */
> > +	RAPL_CPU(0x55, rapl_defaults_hsw_server),/* Skylake server */
> >  	RAPL_CPU(0x56, rapl_defaults_core),/* Future Xeon */
> >  	RAPL_CPU(0x5A, rapl_defaults_ann),/* Annidale */
> >  	RAPL_CPU(0X5C, rapl_defaults_core),/* Broxton */
> > 
> 
> Can you please rebase this on top of 4.7-rc3?

Or rather on top of the x86/cpu branch from tip?

BTW, I can take the Denverton support for RAPL too (unless already applied
elsewhere), but it has to be based on x86/cpu as well.

Thanks,
Rafael