[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAD=FV=U0XuOEBXsuf7cdp-mhe8=XJer9EoRJ99-2Mx_0=CFt-g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2016 16:05:27 -0700
From: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
To: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@...k-chips.com>
Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Ziyuan Xu <xzy.xu@...k-chips.com>,
Brian Norris <briannorris@...omium.org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
"open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..." <linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/11] phy: rockchip-emmc: Minor code cleanup in rockchip_emmc_phy_power_off()
Hi,
On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 1:56 AM, Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@...k-chips.com> wrote:
> On 2016/6/8 6:44, Douglas Anderson wrote:
>>
>> There's no reason to store the return value of rockchip_emmc_phy_power()
>> in a variable nor to check it. Just return it.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
>> ---
>> drivers/phy/phy-rockchip-emmc.c | 8 +-------
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/phy/phy-rockchip-emmc.c
>> b/drivers/phy/phy-rockchip-emmc.c
>> index 0fce7359d468..188e4c387ba8 100644
>> --- a/drivers/phy/phy-rockchip-emmc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/phy/phy-rockchip-emmc.c
>> @@ -227,8 +227,6 @@ static int rockchip_emmc_phy_power_off(struct phy
>> *phy)
>> static int rockchip_emmc_phy_power_on(struct phy *phy)
>> {
>
>
> I saw the cleanup for power_off is done on [patch 9/11]
>
> shouldn't be in this patch? :)
Yeah, I tried to, but then I realized that I couldn't split that out
too easily because the previous patch touched the same code.
...but actually, reordering things solves all the problems so I've done that.
-Doug
Powered by blists - more mailing lists