[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160613085608.GG26768@pengutronix.de>
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2016 10:56:08 +0200
From: Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
To: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>
Cc: Felipe Balbi <balbi@...nel.org>,
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>,
Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: gadget: udc: atmel: Also get regmap for
at91sam9x5-pmc
Hello,
On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 10:47:30AM +0200, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> The "atmel,at91sam9g45-udc" compatible UDC is also used on at91sam9x5 so it
> is also necessary to try to get the syscon for at91sam9x5-pmc.
>
> Fixes: 4747639f01c9 ("usb: gadget: atmel: access the PMC using regmap")
> Reported-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
I played with the AT91 during my non-work time, so please use
uwe@...ine-koenig.org as my email address.
> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>
> ---
> drivers/usb/gadget/udc/atmel_usba_udc.c | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/atmel_usba_udc.c b/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/atmel_usba_udc.c
> index 18569de06b04..bb1f6c8f0f01 100644
> --- a/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/atmel_usba_udc.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/udc/atmel_usba_udc.c
> @@ -1920,6 +1920,8 @@ static struct usba_ep * atmel_udc_of_init(struct platform_device *pdev,
>
> udc->errata = match->data;
> udc->pmc = syscon_regmap_lookup_by_compatible("atmel,at91sam9g45-pmc");
> + if (IS_ERR(udc->pmc))
> + udc->pmc = syscon_regmap_lookup_by_compatible("atmel,at91sam9x5-pmc");
> if (udc->errata && IS_ERR(udc->pmc))
> return ERR_CAST(udc->pmc);
I didn't retest but I'm sure this makes usb gadget work on my AT91.
Still I'm unsure if the patch is correct. Can
syscon_regmap_lookup_by_compatible("atmel,at91sam9g45-pmc")
return -EPROBE_DEFER? Are there other error codes that should be fatal
enough to not try to look for a sam9x5-pmc?
Nearly orthogonal to the issue: An error message on failure would be
nice. When I saw usb gadget broken I first had to add messages to this
driver to see where it failed.
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Powered by blists - more mailing lists