[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <575EB62F.4010107@de.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2016 15:33:35 +0200
From: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@...ibm.com>,
Christian Borntraeger <christian.borntraeger@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] KVM: do not use kvm->online_vcpus to check "has one
VCPU been created?"
On 06/13/2016 03:25 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> kvm->online_vcpus is only updated at the very end of KVM_CREATE_VCPU.
> Thus, it can be racy to use it as a check for "has any VCPU been created
> already?". While x86 detects the race through kvm_vcpu_compatible,
> it is kinda hackish and s390 does not do anything similar. Provide a
> better fix for both.
>
> Paolo Bonzini (3):
> KVM: introduce created_vcpus
> KVM: remove kvm_vcpu_compatible
> KVM: s390: use created_vcpus
>
> arch/s390/kvm/kvm-s390.c | 10 +++++-----
> arch/x86/kvm/Kconfig | 1 -
> arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 11 +++--------
> include/linux/kvm_host.h | 14 ++++++++------
> virt/kvm/Kconfig | 3 ---
> virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++----------
> 6 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
>
>From a quick look this looks "the right thing". Will do a proper review
later this day or tomorrow.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists