| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2016 04:47:24 +0000
From: "Sajjan, Vikas C" <vikas.cha.sajjan@....com>
To: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>,
"linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Lakshminarasimha, Sunil Vishwanathpur" <sunil.vl@....com>,
Prashanth Prakash <pprakash@...eaurora.org>,
Ashwin Chaugule <ashwin.chaugule@...aro.org>,
"Al Stone" <al.stone@...aro.org>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v5 4/5] arm64: add support for ACPI Low Power Idle(LPI)
Hi Sudeep,
-----Original Message-----
From: Sudeep Holla [mailto:sudeep.holla@....com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2016 9:08 PM
To: linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org; Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net>
Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; Sajjan, Vikas C <vikas.cha.sajjan@....com>; Lakshminarasimha, Sunil Vishwanathpur <sunil.vl@....com>; Prashanth Prakash <pprakash@...eaurora.org>; Ashwin Chaugule <ashwin.chaugule@...aro.org>; Al Stone <al.stone@...aro.org>; Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>; Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>; linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v5 4/5] arm64: add support for ACPI Low Power Idle(LPI)
This patch adds appropriate callbacks to support ACPI Low Power Idle
(LPI) on ARM64.
Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@....com>
---
arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c | 48 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
drivers/firmware/psci.c | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 104 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c index d1ce8e2f98b9..bf82ce5c8fce 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c
@@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
#include <linux/acpi.h>
#include <linux/bootmem.h>
#include <linux/cpumask.h>
+#include <linux/cpu_pm.h>
#include <linux/init.h>
#include <linux/irq.h>
#include <linux/irqdomain.h>
@@ -25,6 +26,9 @@
#include <linux/of_fdt.h>
#include <linux/smp.h>
+#include <acpi/processor.h>
+
+#include <asm/cpuidle.h>
#include <asm/cputype.h>
#include <asm/cpu_ops.h>
#include <asm/smp_plat.h>
@@ -211,6 +215,50 @@ void __init acpi_boot_table_init(void)
}
}
+int acpi_processor_ffh_lpi_probe(unsigned int cpu) {
+ return arm_cpuidle_init(cpu);
+}
+
+#define ACPI_FFH_LPI_ARM_FLAGS_CORE_CONTEXT BIT(0)
+#define ACPI_FFH_LPI_ARM_FLAGS_TRACE_CONTEXT BIT(1)
+#define ACPI_FFH_LPI_ARM_FLAGS_GICR_CONTEXT BIT(2)
+#define ACPI_FFH_LPI_ARM_FLAGS_GICD_CONTEXT BIT(3)
+#define ACPI_FFH_LPI_ARM_FLAGS_ALL_CONTEXT \
+ (ACPI_FFH_LPI_ARM_FLAGS_CORE_CONTEXT | \
+ ACPI_FFH_LPI_ARM_FLAGS_TRACE_CONTEXT | \
+ ACPI_FFH_LPI_ARM_FLAGS_GICR_CONTEXT | \
+ ACPI_FFH_LPI_ARM_FLAGS_GICD_CONTEXT)
+
+struct acpi_lpi_state *lpi;
+int acpi_processor_ffh_lpi_enter(struct acpi_lpi_state *lpi, int idx) {
+ int ret = 0;
+ bool save_ctx = lpi->arch_flags & ACPI_FFH_LPI_ARM_FLAGS_ALL_CONTEXT;
+
+ if (!idx) {
+ cpu_do_idle();
+ return idx;
+ }
+
+ /* TODO cpu_pm_{enter,exit} can be done in generic code ? */
+ if (save_ctx)
+ ret = cpu_pm_enter();
+ if (!ret) {
+ /*
+ * Pass idle state index to cpu_suspend which in turn will
+ * call the CPU ops suspend protocol with idle index as a
+ * parameter.
+ */
+ ret = arm_cpuidle_suspend(idx);
+
+ if (save_ctx)
+ cpu_pm_exit();
+ }
+
+ return ret ? -1 : idx;
+}
+
#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_APEI
pgprot_t arch_apei_get_mem_attribute(phys_addr_t addr) { diff --git a/drivers/firmware/psci.c b/drivers/firmware/psci.c index fa4ea22ca12e..e06bfee68e1d 100644
--- a/drivers/firmware/psci.c
+++ b/drivers/firmware/psci.c
@@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
#define pr_fmt(fmt) "psci: " fmt
+#include <linux/acpi.h>
#include <linux/arm-smccc.h>
#include <linux/cpuidle.h>
#include <linux/errno.h>
@@ -310,11 +311,66 @@ static int psci_dt_cpu_init_idle(struct device_node *cpu_node, int cpu)
return ret;
}
+#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
+#include <acpi/processor.h>
+
+static int __maybe_unused psci_acpi_cpu_init_idle(unsigned int cpu) {
+ int i, count;
+ u32 *psci_states;
+ struct acpi_processor *pr;
+ struct acpi_lpi_state *lpi;
+
+ pr = per_cpu(processors, cpu);
+ if (unlikely(!pr || !pr->flags.has_lpi))
Any particular reason for _not_ considering CST flag here.
Or you are planning to add CST support in some other patch set.
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ /*
+ * If the PSCI cpu_suspend function hook has not been initialized
+ * idle states must not be enabled, so bail out
+ */
+ if (!psci_ops.cpu_suspend)
+ return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+
+ count = pr->power.count - 1;
+ if (!count)
+ return -ENODEV;
+
+ psci_states = kcalloc(count, sizeof(*psci_states), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!psci_states)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ for (i = 0; i < count; i++) {
+ u32 state;
+
+ lpi = &pr->power.lpi_states[i + 1];
Same case here too.
+ state = lpi->address & 0xFFFFFFFF;
+ if (!psci_power_state_is_valid(state)) {
+ pr_warn("Invalid PSCI power state %#x\n", state);
+ kfree(psci_states);
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+ psci_states[i] = state;
+ }
+ /* Idle states parsed correctly, initialize per-cpu pointer */
+ per_cpu(psci_power_state, cpu) = psci_states;
+ return 0;
+}
+#else
+static int __maybe_unused psci_acpi_cpu_init_idle(unsigned int cpu) {
+ return -EINVAL;
+}
+#endif
+
int psci_cpu_init_idle(unsigned int cpu) {
struct device_node *cpu_node;
int ret;
+ if (!acpi_disabled)
+ return psci_acpi_cpu_init_idle(cpu);
+
cpu_node = of_get_cpu_node(cpu, NULL);
if (!cpu_node)
return -ENODEV;
--
1.9.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists