[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160613141324.GK6518@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2016 16:13:24 +0200
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
To: linux-mm@...ck.org
Cc: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@...allels.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/10 -v4] Handle oom bypass more gracefully
On Mon 13-06-16 13:23:48, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Thu 09-06-16 13:52:07, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > I would like to explore ways how to remove kthreads (use_mm) special
> > case. It shouldn't be that hard, we just have to teach the page fault
> > handler to recognize oom victim mm and enforce EFAULT for kthreads
> > which have borrowed that mm.
>
> So I was trying to come up with solution for this which would require to
> hook into the pagefault an enforce EFAULT when the mm is being reaped
> by the oom_repaer. Not hard but then I have checked the current users
> and none of them is really needing to read from the userspace (aka
> copy_from_user/get_user). So we actually do not need to do anything
> special.
As pointed out by Tetsuo [1] vhost does realy on copy_from_user. I just
missed that. So scratch this. I will revisit a potential solution for
this but that would be outside of this series scope.
[1] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/201606132252.IAE00593.OJQSFMtVFOLHOF@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
Powered by blists - more mailing lists