[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20160613054055.GV18654@naverao1-tp.localdomain>
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2016 11:10:59 +0530
From: "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, matt@...abs.org, kda@...ux-powerpc.org,
paulus@...ba.org, ast@...com, daniel@...earbox.net,
ananth@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] eBPF JIT for PPC64
On 2016/06/10 10:47PM, David Miller wrote:
> From: "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2016 19:02:17 +0530
>
> > Please note that patch [2] is a pre-requisite for this patchset, and is
> > not yet upstream.
> ...
> > [1] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/2188694
> > [2] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.ports.ppc.embedded/96514
>
> Because of #2 I don't think I can take this directly into the networking
> tree, right?
>
> Therefore, how would you like this to be merged?
Hi David,
Thanks for asking. Yes, I think it is better to take this through the
powerpc tree as all the changes are contained within arch/powerpc,
unless Michael Ellerman feels differently.
Michael?
Regards,
Naveen
Powered by blists - more mailing lists