[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160613154614.GC23990@infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2016 08:46:14 -0700
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>
Cc: Ming Lei <ming.lei@...onical.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...il.com>,
"4.3+" <stable@...r.kernel.org>, Shaohua Li <shli@...com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] block: make sure big bio is splitted into at most 256
bvecs
On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 01:37:17PM +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> Hmm. So everybody is suffering because someone _might_ be using bio_clone?
> Why can't we fixup bio_clone() (or the callers of which) to correctly
> set the queue limits?
The only one suffering is bcache. Everyone else uses bios below the
block layer arbitrary max size. The fixup to allow bio_clone support
a larger size is the same one as to allow everyone else submitting
larger bios: increase BIO_MAX_PAGES and create the required mempools
to back that new larger size. Or just go for multipage biovecs..
Powered by blists - more mailing lists