lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160613154614.GC23990@infradead.org>
Date:	Mon, 13 Jun 2016 08:46:14 -0700
From:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To:	Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>
Cc:	Ming Lei <ming.lei@...onical.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
	Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...il.com>,
	"4.3+" <stable@...r.kernel.org>, Shaohua Li <shli@...com>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] block: make sure big bio is splitted into at most 256
 bvecs

On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 01:37:17PM +0200, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> Hmm. So everybody is suffering because someone _might_ be using bio_clone?
> Why can't we fixup bio_clone() (or the callers of which) to correctly
> set the queue limits?

The only one suffering is bcache.  Everyone else uses bios below the
block layer arbitrary max size.  The fixup to allow bio_clone support
a larger size is the same one as to allow everyone else submitting
larger bios:  increase BIO_MAX_PAGES and create the required mempools
to back that new larger size.  Or just go for multipage biovecs..

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ