linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/3] MIPS: BMIPS: Add BCM6345 support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <575E4E08.3070801@gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 13 Jun 2016 08:09:12 +0200
From:	Álvaro Fernández Rojas <noltari@...il.com>
To:	Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
Cc:	linux-mips@...ux-mips.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, ralf@...ux-mips.org,
	f.fainelli@...il.com, jogo@...nwrt.org, cernekee@...il.com,
	simon@...e.lp0.eu
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] MIPS: BMIPS: Add BCM6345 support



El 6/6/16 a las 15:58, Rob Herring escribió:
> On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 10:12:03AM +0200, Álvaro Fernández Rojas wrote:
>> BCM6345 has only one CPU, so SMP support must be disabled.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Álvaro Fernández Rojas <noltari@...il.com>
>> ---
>>  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mips/brcm/soc.txt | 2 +-
>>  arch/mips/bmips/setup.c                             | 9 +++++++++
>>  2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mips/brcm/soc.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mips/brcm/soc.txt
>> index 4a7e030..1936e8a 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mips/brcm/soc.txt
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mips/brcm/soc.txt
>> @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ Required properties:
>>  
>>  - compatible: "brcm,bcm3384", "brcm,bcm33843"
>>                "brcm,bcm3384-viper", "brcm,bcm33843-viper"
>> -              "brcm,bcm6328", "brcm,bcm6358", "brcm,bcm6368",
>> +              "brcm,bcm6328", "brcm,bcm6345", "brcm,bcm6358", "brcm,bcm6368",
>>                "brcm,bcm63168", "brcm,bcm63268",
>>                "brcm,bcm7125", "brcm,bcm7346", "brcm,bcm7358", "brcm,bcm7360",
>>                "brcm,bcm7362", "brcm,bcm7420", "brcm,bcm7425"
> 
> Are these all mutually exclusive? Please make that clear.
> 

They are different CPUs so I guess they're are all mutually exclusive.

Álvaro.