linux-kernel - Re: [Cocci] [PATCH 4/4] coccicheck: add indexing enhancement options

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160613183759.GN11948@wotan.suse.de>
Date:	Mon, 13 Jun 2016 20:37:59 +0200
From:	"Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...nel.org>
To:	Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
Cc:	Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>,
	"Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@...nel.org>, cocci@...teme.lip6.fr,
	mmarek@...e.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Cocci] [PATCH 4/4] coccicheck: add indexing enhancement options

On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 07:54:39AM +0200, Julia Lawall wrote:
> 
> 
> On Sat, 11 Jun 2016, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> 
> > 
> > > real    16m11.692s
> > > user    127m50.388s
> > > sys     0m2.168s
> > 
> > That's better but not a magnitude, I wonder.
> 
> I think that it is because the filtering that Coccinelle does already 
> works pretty well, and there are quite a lot of files (7514) that contain 
> kfree.

Is there another scripts/coccinelle/ file I can use to test against to demo
against glimpse/idutils/gitgrep best?

  Luis