[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdZKnxsa2EjAU4zkLaDLexqAeqtChC_Xa=2=1tveN0VVjg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2016 08:26:47 +0200
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/9] pinctrl: baytrail: make it explicitly non-modular
On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 4:43 AM, Paul Gortmaker
<paul.gortmaker@...driver.com> wrote:
> The Kconfig currently controlling compilation of this code is:
>
> config PINCTRL_BAYTRAIL
> bool "Intel Baytrail GPIO pin control"
>
> ...meaning that it currently is not being built as a module by anyone.
>
> Lets remove the modular code that is essentially orphaned, so that
> when reading the driver there is no doubt it is builtin-only.
>
> We explicitly disallow a driver unbind, since that doesn't have a
> sensible use case anyway, and it allows us to drop the ".remove"
> code for non-modular drivers.
>
> Since module_init() was already not in use in this driver, we don't
> have any concerns with init ordering changes here.
>
> Also note that MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE is a no-op for non-modular code.
>
> We also delete the MODULE_LICENSE tag etc. since all that information
> is already contained at the top of the file in the comments.
>
> Cc: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
> Cc: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>
> Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
> Cc: linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>
Patch applied with Mika's ACK.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
Powered by blists - more mailing lists