[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1606132114190.5839@nanos>
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2016 21:14:47 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com>
cc: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>,
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>,
Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard <plagnioj@...osoft.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 44/48] clocksource: atmel-pit: allow unselecting
ATMEL_PIT
On Mon, 13 Jun 2016, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> On Sat, 11 Jun 2016 12:53:51 +0200
> Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com> wrote:
>
> > On 11/06/2016 at 11:43:54 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote :
> > > On Sat, 11 Jun 2016, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> > >
> > > > With the new TCB clocksource driver, atmel platforms are now able to boot
> > > > without the PIT driver. Allow unselecting it.
> > >
> > > Yay! Thanks for doing this!
> > >
> >
> > Sure! Can you still check the request_irq/free_irq in
> > timer-atmel-tcbclksrc? I'm not sure whether this can work reliably or
> > only because we are before SYSTEM_STATE=RUNNING.
> > In the latter case, I have another way of doing that.
> >
>
> Sorry to put it back on the table, but shouldn't we consider adding
> these irq_disable/enable_action() helpers?
I fear that's the only reliable way to do it.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists