[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1824456.bQhIAi46Pe@vostro.rjw.lan>
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2016 22:58:52 +0200
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>
To: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
Cc: "Shreyas B. Prabhu" <shreyas@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
mpe@...erman.id.au, benh@....ibm.com, paulus@...abs.org,
mikey@...ling.org, ego@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
maddy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 09/11] cpuidle/powernv: Use CPUIDLE_STATE_MAX instead of MAX_POWERNV_IDLE_STATES
On Monday, June 13, 2016 05:01:50 PM Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 11:54:29AM -0500, Shreyas B. Prabhu wrote:
> > Use cpuidle's CPUIDLE_STATE_MAX macro instead of powernv specific
> > MAX_POWERNV_IDLE_STATES.
> >
> > Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
> > Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
> > Cc: linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
> > Suggested-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Shreyas B. Prabhu <shreyas@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > ---
>
> Acked-by: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
Since this seems to depend on some other patches in the series, I'm expecting
it to go in along with the patches it depends on.
Thanks,
Rafael
Powered by blists - more mailing lists