linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/6] Support DAX for device-mapper dm-linear devices

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 13 Jun 2016 17:02:39 -0700
From:	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
To:	"Kani, Toshimitsu" <toshi.kani@....com>
Cc:	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"agk@...hat.com" <agk@...hat.com>,
	"linux-raid@...r.kernel.org" <linux-raid@...r.kernel.org>,
	"snitzer@...hat.com" <snitzer@...hat.com>,
	"viro@...iv.linux.org.uk" <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
	"axboe@...nel.dk" <axboe@...nel.dk>,
	"linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org" <linux-nvdimm@...ts.01.org>,
	"ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com" <ross.zwisler@...ux.intel.com>,
	"dm-devel@...hat.com" <dm-devel@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] Support DAX for device-mapper dm-linear devices

On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 4:59 PM, Kani, Toshimitsu <toshi.kani@....com> wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-06-13 at 16:18 -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
>> Thanks Toshi!
>>
>> On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 3:21 PM, Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@....com> wrote:
>> >
>> > This patch-set adds DAX support to device-mapper dm-linear devices
>> > used by LVM.  It works with LVM commands as follows:
>> >  - Creation of a logical volume with all DAX capable devices (such
>> >    as pmem) sets the logical volume DAX capable as well.
>> >  - Once a logical volume is set to DAX capable, the volume may not
>> >    be extended with non-DAX capable devices.
>>
>> I don't mind this, but it seems a policy decision that the kernel does
>> not need to make.  A sufficiently sophisticated user could cope with
>> DAX being available at varying LBAs.  Would it be sufficient to move
>> this policy decision to userspace tooling?
>
> I think this is a kernel restriction.  When a block device is declared as
> DAX capable, it should mean that the whole device is DAX capable.  So, I
> think we need to assure the same to a mapped device.

Hmm, but we already violate this with badblocks.  The device is DAX
capable, but certain LBAs will return an error if direct_access is
attempted.