[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <F7BC1638-0C44-4ED5-8483-EEF9A673EA4B@linuxhacker.ru>
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2016 18:54:58 -0400
From: Oleg Drokin <green@...uxhacker.ru>
To: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...chiereds.net>
Cc: "J . Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>,
linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] nfsd: Always lock state exclusively.
On Jun 14, 2016, at 6:52 PM, Jeff Layton wrote:
> I think I'd still prefer to have it unlock the mutex in the event that
> it's not going to use it after all. While that kind of thing is ok for
> now, it's stuff like that that can turn into a subtle source of bugs
> later.
>
> Also, I think I'd be more comfortable with this being split into (at
> least) two patches. Do one patch as a straight conversion from rwsem to
> mutex, and then another that changes the code to take the mutex before
> hashing the new stateid.
Ok, I guess that could be arranged too.
And then there's this Bruce's patch to pull more stuff into the init_open_stateid
Powered by blists - more mailing lists