[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1465886247-3773-1-git-send-email-xinhui.pan@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2016 14:37:27 +0800
From: Pan Xinhui <xinhui.pan@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...hat.com, Waiman.Long@....com,
Pan Xinhui <xinhui.pan@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] locking/qspinlock: Use __this_cpu_dec instead
queued_spin_lock_slowpath should not worry about another
queued_spin_lock_slowpath which runs in interrupt changes node->count by
accident because node->count keeps the same value everytime we
enter/leave queued_spin_lock_slowpath.
On some archs this_cpu_dec will save/restore irq flags, this will give a
heavy work load. Lets use __this_cpu_dec instead.
Signed-off-by: Pan Xinhui <xinhui.pan@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
change from v1:
replace this_cpu_ptr with __this_cpu_dec
---
kernel/locking/qspinlock.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/locking/qspinlock.c b/kernel/locking/qspinlock.c
index 99f31e4..9fd1a1e 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/qspinlock.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/qspinlock.c
@@ -492,7 +492,7 @@ release:
/*
* release the node
*/
- this_cpu_dec(mcs_nodes[0].count);
+ __this_cpu_dec(mcs_nodes[0].count);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(queued_spin_lock_slowpath);
--
1.9.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists