lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160614005940.GD6456@verge.net.au>
Date:	Tue, 14 Jun 2016 09:59:40 +0900
From:	Simon Horman <horms@...ge.net.au>
To:	Kieran Bingham <kieran@...uared.org.uk>
Cc:	Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
	Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
	linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH 0/2] arm64: dts: r8a7795: Add FCPF and FDP1 device
 nodes

On Thu, Jun 09, 2016 at 05:56:56PM +0100, Kieran Bingham wrote:
> Appologies for the resend, I very cleverly sent this cover letter detailing the
> dependencies only to my e-mail address. And I already know the dependencies!
> 
> Following two patches are the same, sorry for the noise.
> 
> These are dependent upon the FCP bindings from Laurent [0], and the FCPF
> update to those bindings from me [1], and of course the bindings for the
> FDP1 [2] which are all posted separately.
> 
> [0] http://www.spinics.net/lists/devicetree/msg123968.html
> [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/6/9/291
> [2] https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/6/9/294

These patches look good to me. My assumption is that they
can be applied without causing any breakage and that the
relevant features will start working once driver support
shows up in the kernel.

If the above assumption is correct then please let me know when the
bindings have been accepted by the relevant subsystem maintainer(s).

If the patches need rebasing at that time then please repost them.
Otherwise you can either repost them or ping me as a response to this thread.

Thanks!

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ