linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH tip/master] [BUGFIX] kprobes/x86: Fix to clear TF bit in fault-on-single-stepping

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 14 Jun 2016 10:19:39 +0900
From:	Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
To:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, systemtap@...rceware.org,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	fenghua.yu@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH tip/master] [BUGFIX] kprobes/x86: Fix to clear TF bit in
 fault-on-single-stepping

On Mon, 13 Jun 2016 19:20:19 -0400
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:

> On Mon, 13 Jun 2016 19:13:45 -0400
> Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> wrote:
> 
> 
> > >   # cd /sys/kernel/debug/tracing
> > >   # echo p copy_user_enhanced_fast_string+5 > kprobe_events
> > >   # echo 1 > events/kprobes/enable
> > > 
> > > And you'll see a kernel panic on do_debug(), since the debug
> > > trap is not handled by kprobes.
> > > 
> > > To fix this problem, we just need to clear the TF bit when
> > > resetting running kprobe.
> > >   
> > 
> > This should definitely be marked for stable, and I bisected it all the
> > way down to this commit: f4cb1cc18f364d "x86-64, copy_user: Remove zero
> > byte check before copy user buffer."

I agree this is for stable.

> > I reverted that commit and sure enough, this bug goes away. I'm not
> > saying the revert should be done. I'm just doing an FYI, and showing how
> > changes that appear to be a nice clean up can have subtle effects. I'm
> > not even sure how that change caused this to be a problem with kprobes.
> > 
> 
> Nevermind, reverting that commit only moved the location of the
> "rep movsb" that you were placing the kprobe on. When I do:
> 
>   echo "p copy_user_enhanced_fast_string+9" > kprobe_events
> 
> I get the same result.
> 
> That means we need to make that stable tag even earlier.

Yeah, I think it may never be tested from beginning,
so more thant 10 years we have this issue on the kernel.
I recommend this for all the stable/long term support kernels.

Thank you,

-- 
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>