[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <tip-354542d034ab2a849a284edcc661e76b753a57dc@git.kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2016 04:25:22 -0700
From: tip-bot for Andi Kleen <tipbot@...or.com>
To: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc: hpa@...or.com, brgerst@...il.com, bp@...en8.de,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, tony.luck@...el.com,
mingo@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ak@...ux.intel.com,
dvlasenk@...hat.com, bp@...e.de, tglx@...utronix.de,
luto@...capital.net
Subject: [tip:x86/microcode] x86/microcode/intel: Do not issue microcode
updates messages on each CPU
Commit-ID: 354542d034ab2a849a284edcc661e76b753a57dc
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/354542d034ab2a849a284edcc661e76b753a57dc
Author: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
AuthorDate: Thu, 9 Jun 2016 06:41:41 -0700
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
CommitDate: Tue, 14 Jun 2016 10:51:43 +0200
x86/microcode/intel: Do not issue microcode updates messages on each CPU
On large systems the microcode driver is very noisy, because it prints a
line for each CPU. The lines are redundant because usually all CPUs are
updated to the same microcode revision.
All other subsystems have been patched previously to not print a line
for each CPU. Only the microcode driver is left.
Only print an microcode revision update when something changed. This
results in typically only a single line being printed.
Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: Brian Gerst <brgerst@...il.com>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>
Cc: elliott@....com
Cc: hmh@....eng.br
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160609134141.5981-1-andi@firstfloor.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++-------
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
index 8962d6a..6515c80 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/microcode/intel.c
@@ -843,6 +843,7 @@ void reload_ucode_intel(void)
static int collect_cpu_info(int cpu_num, struct cpu_signature *csig)
{
+ static struct cpu_signature prev;
struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &cpu_data(cpu_num);
unsigned int val[2];
@@ -857,8 +858,13 @@ static int collect_cpu_info(int cpu_num, struct cpu_signature *csig)
}
csig->rev = c->microcode;
- pr_info("CPU%d sig=0x%x, pf=0x%x, revision=0x%x\n",
- cpu_num, csig->sig, csig->pf, csig->rev);
+
+ /* No extra locking on prev, races are harmless. */
+ if (csig->sig != prev.sig || csig->pf != prev.pf || csig->rev != prev.rev) {
+ pr_info("sig=0x%x, pf=0x%x, revision=0x%x\n",
+ csig->sig, csig->pf, csig->rev);
+ prev = *csig;
+ }
return 0;
}
@@ -887,6 +893,7 @@ static int apply_microcode_intel(int cpu)
struct ucode_cpu_info *uci;
struct cpuinfo_x86 *c;
unsigned int val[2];
+ static int prev_rev;
/* We should bind the task to the CPU */
if (WARN_ON(raw_smp_processor_id() != cpu))
@@ -921,11 +928,14 @@ static int apply_microcode_intel(int cpu)
return -1;
}
- pr_info("CPU%d updated to revision 0x%x, date = %04x-%02x-%02x\n",
- cpu, val[1],
- mc->hdr.date & 0xffff,
- mc->hdr.date >> 24,
- (mc->hdr.date >> 16) & 0xff);
+ if (val[1] != prev_rev) {
+ pr_info("updated to revision 0x%x, date = %04x-%02x-%02x\n",
+ val[1],
+ mc->hdr.date & 0xffff,
+ mc->hdr.date >> 24,
+ (mc->hdr.date >> 16) & 0xff);
+ prev_rev = val[1];
+ }
c = &cpu_data(cpu);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists