[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdXEjxWY=0Vuu=aHupexVg1hERPnUromk-2sCjwbDn8H1w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2016 15:10:52 +0200
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To: Joonsoo Kim <js1304@...il.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>,
Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: Boot failure on emev2/kzm9d (was: Re: [PATCH v2 11/11] mm/slab:
lockless decision to grow cache)
Hi Jonsoo,
On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 9:43 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven
<geert@...ux-m68k.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 6:51 AM, <js1304@...il.com> wrote:
>> From: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>
>> To check whther free objects exist or not precisely, we need to grab a
>> lock. But, accuracy isn't that important because race window would be
>> even small and if there is too much free object, cache reaper would reap
>> it. So, this patch makes the check for free object exisistence not to
>> hold a lock. This will reduce lock contention in heavily allocation case.
>> Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>
>
> I've bisected a boot failure (no output at all) in v4.7-rc2 on emev2/kzm9d
> (Renesas dual Cortex A9) to this patch, which is upstream commit
> 801faf0db8947e01877920e848a4d338dd7a99e7.
BTW, when disabling SMP, the problem goes away.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
Powered by blists - more mailing lists